Does anybody wanna

Chatterbox: Down to Earth

Does anybody wanna

Does anybody wanna talk about global warming?

submitted by Willa C., age 12 4/4, The Oregon
(August 1, 2008 - 1:33 pm)

Actually, to be really persnickety, Global Warming is the unnatural change, Global Climate Change is the (much more limited) natural cycle.

submitted by Vendy, age 16, Museica
(September 3, 2008 - 11:20 am)
The Huntmaster looked up in surprise. The CBers have found me! she thought. Quickly, she scribbled a note on a piece of paper and disappeared with a loud crack!
--
“What was that?” asked the CBette.
“Not sure, but- look! There’s a note!” said the CBer.
He picked it up and read it aloud.
“Dearest hunters,
“You have done well thus far. You need only go a bit farther to find the key to success. It contains the soul of a ruthless being - Lord Voldemort. Where might that have been mentioned? Huh…
“Good luck,
“The Huntmaster.”
submitted by sss
(February 4, 2019 - 4:16 pm)

I believe in global warming, but I don't think it really matters. Whether global warming is human caused, or livestock caused (by the way, this would really be human caused, too, because we're the ones that breed the livestock for food), or naturally caused, or not existing, we should still take care of our enviroment.

Look at it this way: even assuming that global warming is part of a natural cycle, it's obvious that humans have impacted the enviroment. Just look at the air pollution in Beijing or Los Angeles, the trees that have been cut down around the world, and the oil that has been spilled into our oceans. The point is, humans have had an impact on the enviroment, and I'm pretty darn sure that it's a negative one.

Sure, we could do nothing, and keep enjoying our Hummers and our wood houses and our food produced halfway across the world. But we need to remember that we are not the only living things on this planet. It would be an awful shame for our kids and grandkids to not have ever seen a tiger, or a giant panda, or a daisy, except in books. Do we want the ocelot to go the way of the dodo?

Humans should start working on becoming "green", with or without global warming. We can sit here and discuss it all we want, but until people get up and actually do something, we're still toast. We've gotten much better in the past few years about reducing, reusing, and recyling, but we still have many more improvements we can make. That's what we should be focusing on, not the global warming debate.

submitted by Cat's Meow, age 13, Washington Stat
(August 11, 2008 - 12:36 pm)

You have my point of view exactly!  I think that global warming may be influenced by humans but it is definitely a natural cycle.  But I don't think this means we should just sit and let the Earth rot around us!  We can still do more to help our environment.  Here is a short-ish list of easy things! 1.use reusable bags, these help cut down on waste. If you can't do this, many grocery stores have a bag2bag program where they turn old plastic bags into new ones. Also don't use paper bags for lunches, instead use a reusable one.  2.Take shorter showers. Some people say 5 min is best but this is hard to do, instead shoot for 10-15min showers and cut out baths except for every once in a while because they waste the most water. 3)Do the easy things. Turning off the water when you brush your teeth, turning off lights, and getting leaks fixed fast are all easy ways to help the environment. 4)This ones most important: RECYCLE (and reuse) Check with your local recycling plant but usually they take all of this: all paper (newspaper, magazines, loose-leaf, etc), any plastic marked with a little 1 or 2 inside the recycle triangle (you have to take the caps off of bottles because they can't be recycled, and never put plastic bags into the recycling ever), also they take soda cans.  Ask about glass it varies.  And give away old clothes, furniture, whatever. There are stores all over the place that will accept your old stuff (Goodwill) along with clothing places that will do trades!

It's easy to help the environment! Just make little changes!

submitted by Wendy C., age 15, Ohio
(August 12, 2008 - 9:32 pm)

It's not real at all.  It's just a natural cycle.  My dad lived during the second ice age about forty years ago.  Plus, why don't you come visit me in Maine.  This summer, we haven't had a day that was over 80 degrees.  Normal summers it's from 80-100 degrees.  Personally I think all the global warming people live in hot places like Florida, and other people fall for their trick.  I am not completely anti-global warming.  I do recycle and do other stuff.  Sorry if I hurt the gullible peoples' feelings.

submitted by Paige P., age 12, Gorham, Maine
(August 12, 2008 - 6:50 pm)

Yeah, I agree. We've had some hot summers for the last few years, but this summer there haven't been half the sweltering days there have been. Speaking of plastic bags, a good way to reuse them is to carry library books in.

submitted by Emily L., age 13, WA
(August 13, 2008 - 1:18 pm)

That's a good idea for plastic bags, plus another idea is, just bring them back to grocery store and reuse them!!!!!  It's the most obvious thing!!!!!  And, my grocery store gives you a ten cents discount for every paper bag you bring in to reuse.

submitted by Paige P., age 12, Gorham, Maine
(August 14, 2008 - 9:43 pm)

Hey did you know global warming goes both ways? Because it's messing with the air temperature it means that the weather will be weird. In colder places it will cool down and become a more temparate zone (Tell us if you have a normal amount of snow this winter). In warmer places it will just keep heating up.

submitted by Wendy C., age 15, Ohio
(August 15, 2008 - 8:32 pm)

Just because it's called global warming does not mean that all places are going to get a lot warmer.  A more accurate name is climate change. We in oregon are having a very weird summer, in fact I'm looking out the window right now and it is a bit overcast.  In August!  Also we had a very rainy spring and as a result, not very good pollination. We have twenty-something blueberry bushes and no blueberries (Usually we have them in mid July). 

submitted by Willa C., age 12 4/4, Nehalem, Or
(August 17, 2008 - 12:02 pm)

I don't live much further north than you, but for some reason this year there was a bumper crop of blueberries, and we only have three bushes.

submitted by Emily L., age 13, WA
(August 17, 2008 - 6:14 pm)

I haven't heard anything about "the second ice age about forty years ago". It must have been pretty small. I think that there's something most of you are missing about global warming however, as it won't make your summer this year suddenly hotter. It's a gradual process that will take years, as climate zones shift North. I am a "global warming person", as you say, but I live in New York. I don't know why people down South would say it's getting hotter either, but that's besides the point. You need to try to do some research, getting reliable information, like from real scientists. There are places that will try to trick you tough, for example, the Heartland Institute, which has received millions of dollars in funding form the Exxon-Mobile corporation, a gigantic  multi-national company which sells oil. Sound reliable? I encourage you to go out and try to find hard facts, which might not be easy to do because you're already opposed to the idea, but you seem smart enough. The movie An Inconvenient Truth would be a good place to start.

submitted by Vendy, age 16, Museica
(September 3, 2008 - 11:18 am)

It should be called A Convienient Falsehood. I would explain, but as someone else said (sorry!! I'm not looking at your post at the moment) the truth is tangled in a web of politics.

submitted by Emily L., age 13, WA
(September 5, 2008 - 7:38 pm)

Take a look at the MBH98 Reconstruction Northern Hemisphere Temperature Graph on Wikipedia. I know the old graph is outdated. But the new one is just as bad. You won't explain your side, because you don't have solid evidence. Why won't you read my post?

Most, no, an overwhelming majority of scientists agree that Glaobal Warming is true.

submitted by Vendy, age 16, Museica
(September 6, 2008 - 10:42 am)

I'm not talking about the science aspect when I say that. If you want to talk about scientific disproof, fine. But I won't go into the politics, with Al Gore and all that. Here's some science. The solar flare chart compares a lot more closely with global warming than the greenhouse gasses chart. By the way, don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia. Anyone can put anything at all on there.

submitted by Emily L., age 13, WA
(September 15, 2008 - 8:00 pm)

Ok, the Wikipedia article on Global Warming is both locked and very well cited. See my post on Creation vs. Evolution.

~For the political bit, Al Gore is no longer a politician. He's a businessman.

~The Science bit: 

According to PMOD at World Radiation Center there has been no increase in solar irradiance
since at least 1978, when satellite observations began. This means that for the
last thirty years, while the temperature has been rising fastest, the sun has not changed.
There has been work done reconstructing the solar irradiance record over
the last century, before satellites were available. According to the Max Planck Institute, where this work is being done, there has been no increase in
solar irradiance since around 1940. This reconstruction does show an increase in the first part of the
20th century, which coincides with the warming from around 1900 until the 1940s.

-From grist.org

submitted by Vendy, age 16, Museica
(September 16, 2008 - 9:06 pm)