NASA burned a

Chatterbox: Chirp at Cricket

NASA burned a

NASA burned a large part of the moon! They were 'looking to see if there was any water that could possibly support underground life' *fumes*! Don't they know that if there is life under the moon, they've destroyed it?!!! It's not a big satellite! There's only room for so many organisms! You can't just go making the few that might be there extinct just to find out whether it ever existed! That's WRONG! *takes a deep breath* I'm sorry, I'm just really angry at them right now. Sure, life on the moon probably doesn't exist, but they were specifically looking for it! What's the point of finding it if they just destroy it before they find out it's there? As if we haven't done enough damage to Earth as it is... *shakes head* I just can't believe that they would be so selfish and corrupt. I never thought I'd say this, since I'd always thought it would be great if there was life on nearby planets and satellites, but I really hope there was no life in the moon to begin with.

 

Ima, I think that they were looking for ice, evidence that at one time there may have been water there.

Old Cricket

submitted by Ima
(October 9, 2009 - 8:47 pm)

I think I heard about that in social studies...hehe current event frieday!

submitted by Maggie S. , age 13, 13
(October 10, 2009 - 6:48 am)

Oh yeah I heard about that in science and I totally agree with you.

submitted by Coco, age 11, an ice cube (ma
(October 31, 2009 - 10:29 am)